Health
AI Tool Personalizes Immunotherapy for Better Results, Fewer Risks!
A new AI tool improves cancer immunotherapy safety and efficacy with personalized response predictions.
United States: An Alternative to chemotherapy, immunotherapy has been showcasing promising results in the treatment of cancer. However, a new artificial intelligence tool is designed to make sure the patient receives the best possible experience.
More about the Immunotherapy
According to Fox News, it was first approved in 2011, and it takes the help of the cancer patient’s own immune system in order to attack the cancer.
However, according to the experts, the method is not conducive for every individual, as the reports reveal that only 15 percent to 20 percent of those who have used it have experienced its life-saving results.
Moreover, similar to other kinds of medications, immunotherapy also shows certain side effects that can be lethal at times, as the reports stated.
As per the studies, there are 10 percent to 15 percent of the patients developed “significant toxicities.”
More about the AI model
For the past five years, the model’s development has been in progress by GE HealthCare in collaboration with Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) in Nashville, Tennessee, where the model was trained on thousands of patients’ electronic health records (EHRs).
It is done to recognize various patterns in how they have to respond to immunotherapy while focusing on safety and effectiveness.
Jan Wolber, global digital product leader at GE HealthCare’s pharmaceutical diagnostics segment, stated, “The model predicts which patients are likely to derive the benefit from immunotherapy versus those patients who may not,” as Fox News reported.
Moreover, “It also predicts which patients have a likelihood of developing one or more significant toxins,” he added.
How was the model training conducted?
While extracting data from the patient’s health record, the model analyzed the demographic information, imaging scans, preexisting diagnoses, lifestyle habits (such as smoking), medication history, and more.
Travis Osterman, a medical oncologist and associate chief medical information officer at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, said, “All of these data are already being collected by the patient’s oncologist, or they’re filling out a form in the waiting room ahead of time,” as the Fox News reported.
“We’re not asking for additional blood samples or complex imaging. These are all data points that we’re already collecting — vital signs, diagnoses, lab values, those sorts of things,” Osterman said.
The study findings were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology Clinical Cancer Informatics.
As per the study reports, the AI model showed 70 to 80 percent accuracy in forecasting the patients’ responses to immunotherapies.
Wolder added, “While the models are not perfect, this is actually a very good result,” and, “We can implement those models with very little additional effort because there are no additional measurements required in the clinic.”
United States: As experts note, if one skips a workout or stays up late, his/her brain might still be paying for it even two weeks from now.
The team of researchers from Aalto University and the University of Oulu in Finland have presented how our lifelong daily behaviors influence brain connectivity and how they remain remodeled throughout our lifespan, thus providing valuable grounds for understanding neural plasticity.
More about the finding
Researchers are now very specific that the ways our brains communicate also change, rather than staying the same over a long time, in response to recent experiences over a long extended time period.
Moreover, they also rejected several principles of brain function stability and opened the consciousness of the influence of human daily habits on the neural network, studyfinds.org reported.
The particular experimental design of this study was examined in one subject over the span of five months and reported in PLOS Biology.
Are Your Daily Habits Remodeling Your Brain? Find Out! Credit | Adobe Stock
By acquiring a brain image every few days and integrating it with data donated by wearables and smartphones, the researchers were able to assess how such pre-mentioned variables as sleep quality, physical activity, mood, and even heart rate variability affect the connectivity of the brain.
Further details of the analysis
The participant, Ana Triana, was also the main researcher in the study and received thirty scans over fifteen weeks.
Each scan involved four different tasks: simple attention task, working memory task, resting state, and then execution of watching the movie.
This variation helped the researchers to trace how various types of brain activities changed along with everyday perceptions.
At the same time, monitoring devices of her sleep/wake cycle, physical movements, and data about her heart and breathing rates were collected.
Simple events can leave “echoes” in our brain for up to 15 days! 🧠@AnaM_Triana and her colleagues were tracking one person’s brain and behavioural activity for five months using brain scans and wearable technology.@JariSaramaki @MedicalReel @eglereanhttps://t.co/Mxm7qRsltF
— Aalto University (@AaltoUniversity) October 9, 2024
The mobile application is used to capture the moods and events of each day. This integration of brain scans and actigraphy gave us an extremely high-resolution picture of how daily experience and brain activity were related, studyfinds.org reported.
The study revealed two distinct patterns of brain response: A brief wave, which lasts for a period of up to seven days, and a long-term wave, which can go up to fifteen days.
Results of the study
One of the interesting outcomes was a strong connection between heart rate variability – which is a measure of the heart’s adaptability – and brain connectivity while resting.
It shows that activities that affect our body’s relaxation response, like stress management ways, can shape our brain wiring even when we’re not actively concentrating on a task.
United States: Obesity remains a huge problem for Americans as far as their health is concerned. New data received by the governments indicate severe obesity, a condition that involves storing far too much fat in the body, has risen to a great extent in the last decade.
More about the study
About 40 percent of the population in the US is obese, according to a 2021-2023 survey of about 6,000 people.
Overall, 9 percent of those polled said they were suffering from severe obesity, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Moreover, women were nearly two times as likely as men to report severe obesity.
The general obesity rate looked to have decreased in comparison to what was observed in the 2017-2020 survey. However, it was not considered as a statistically significant change.
US Obesity Crisis: 40% of Americans Now Obese – What’s Going On? Credit | USA TODAY
That is, the numbers are small enough that there exists a probability that the rates did not fall at all.
What more are the experts stating?
Dr. Samuel Emmerich conducted the latest study for CDC as a public health officer. He said it is still early to determine its impact on the disease, including new obesity treatments, which include weight-loss drugs like Wegovy and Zepbound.
What they found is that the combined obesity estimate of the United States in the last decade has not considerably altered.
According to Emmerich, “We simply can’t see down to that detailed level to prescription medication use and compare that to changes in obesity prevalence.”
The prevalence of severe obesity increased from nearly eight percent in the study between 2013 and 2014 to nearly 10 percent in the most recent study.
Prior to that, obesity rates had risen rapidly in the US since the 1990s, according to US federal research.
🇺🇸 — Nearly 40% of Americans are obese, with cases of severe obesity rising sharply, particularly among women, who are nearly twice as likely as men to be severely obese. In 23 states, more than 1 in 3 adults were obese.
🔗 Source
⚡️ @FolkishObserver | 📱 Follow pic.twitter.com/grwzoWKdTR
— Cod (@DocKnows097) October 2, 2024
Obesity and severe obesity are expressed in terms of BMI, which is calculated with the help of height and weight. The above BMI indicates that a person is obese, as per the Food and Drugs Administration.
Super obesity is defined as the condition when the person’s BMI is 40 or more.
Solveig Cunningham is a professor of global health at Emory University who is interested in obesity.
“Seeing increases in severe obesity is even more alarming because that’s the level of obesity that’s most highly associated with some of the highest levels of cardiovascular disease and diabetes and lower quality of life,” Cunningham added.
Cunningham also added that it is not apparent why severe obesity rates were higher among women.
United States: Recent reports about potential health risks and whether fluoride benefits are as big as once believed have prompted scrutiny of a public health practice – adding fluoride to water supplies.
This is because, as with some questions, the safety of the practice and new data raise questions about the value of fluoride.
More about the news
Adding fluoride to tap water produces only a slight benefit in reducing tooth decay in children’s baby teeth, a new report from the Cochrane Collaboration, an independent group reviewing scientific research, finds.
It is found that adding fluoride to tap water is a slight benefit, leading to slightly fewer cavities in children’s baby teeth, CNN Health reported.
One step in the right direction is to rid our water of fluoride!It’s toxic poison… M.A.H.A. 🇺🇸🦅💯🙌🏻M.A.H.A. https://t.co/WPog4DfVma
” IQ loss in children when exposed to what is presently considered “optimal levels” pic.twitter.com/jAxOFWJSjS— MrsCinkay (@MrsCinkay) October 7, 2024
More about the finding
Research done before 1975 had large benefits; children living in areas with fluoride added to their water averaged about one fewer primary teeth affected by decay than those of children living in areas without water fluoridation.
Those findings don’t apply to more current populations with increased access to other sources of fluoride and lower levels of dental disease at baseline.
Since the 1970s, fluoride-containing toothpaste has been widely available and is more often used.
According to the new report published this week, fluoride in water was tied to a difference in decay of only about a quarter of a tooth, on average, in more recent studies.
The federal judge, last month had asked the US Environmental Agency to further regulate fluoride in drinking water in response to concerns that fluoride may affect young children’s intellectual development, CNN Health reported.
In light of concerns about fluoride’s possible effect on young children’s intellectual development, a federal judge last month ordered that the EPA further regulate fluoride in drinking water.
Some foods and groundwater have fluoride, a mineral. It can help protect tooth enamel, which can erode with acids produced by plaque, bacteria, sugar, and other acids found in your mouth.
The USA began adding fluoride to public water systems in 1945.
Now, almost three-quarters of the US population, about two hundred and nine million people, are served by drinking water systems that have been fluoridated, according to data from the CDC.